Why You Should Ditch The Kit Lens
My very first DSLR was a Sony A200. It was actually the cheapest camera you could buy at the time. It wasn’t until nearly a year after buying the camera that I started to see an improvement in my images.
It took me all of that time to realise the problem wasn’t the camera…it was the lens. Almost ready to pack in photography for good, I put the last of my hope into a cheap, 50mm f1.8. Luckily, it saved the day and reignited my passion for taking pictures.
It was a revelation. It’s at this point that I actually began to learn and grow, to be a photographer and capture images I was truley proud of.
If I could go back in time, and tell myself one thing before getting disappointed with myself and my abilities it would be this:
Ditch the kit lens. Buy a cheap, fast prime and buy nothing else until you learn what photography is about.
That’s it. I’ve spoken before about the downside of kit lenses and the great things about cheap prime lenses. But here’s an overview.
Kit Lenses are named so because they come included with the camera when you buy it. You can spend up to £1000 on a camera, and it will probably come with a kit lens. Depending on the make or model, the kit lens may differ slightly, but they all have a few things in common.
- CHEAP: These lenses are mass produced on a huge scale. All the way from design, to manufacturing, they are made to be as cheap as possible, even if this means compromising on build quality and optics. A kit lens will be almost entirely constructed of plastic, and will be more prone to failure and breakdown. Other cutbacks such as no lens hood, no focus scale and slow autofocus, just make them not a lot of fun to use.
- POOR IMAGE QUALITY: It makes me so sad to hear from people who have made the jump to buy a DSLR, but become disappointed when the see the crappy, blurry, dull images taken with their shiny new cameras. The problem is nothing to do with the camera. It’s all to-do with the lens. I mean you are putting £500 - £1000 worth of high tech, high resolution camera, and making it shoot through £60 worth of plastic and glass. It’s such a waste.
- SLOW: Finally, the one last nail in the coffin is the slow aperture of the kit lens. Most kit lenses are a f3.5 - 5.6, which in terms of light gathering ability, is nothing. Anyone trying to use the standard kit lens for anything other than half decent daylight is going to find blurry and/or noisy images a fact of life, and not much better than a compact camera.
Hopefully, by now you realize that kit lenses aren’t very good.
At this point I could suggest some alternative lenses, that offer a similar zoom range but with better optics and build quality. But, I’m not going to, because these would cost upwards of £400 - £1200.
I really want reiterate the point that you don’t have to spend a lot of money to get a fantastic lens, and one that will be the perfect companion to your first few months/years with your camera.
Anyone buying their very first DSLR needs buy a Nikon 35mm f1.8 or a Canon 50mm f1.8. These lenses are just fantastic for the money, and offer so much more than a standard kit lens.
For just a little extra outlay, you are getting a lens that is small, light but well built, with a metal mount, and an included lens hood. Both also offer, quick and virtually silent autofocus, and whole load of other benefits.
They are almost the polar opposite to kit lenses. They remain cheap. but they gain the ability to take sharper, more colourful images in low light, and help you to learn about the rules of composition and framing. They are also superb lenses for making the often sought after “3D effect”, due to the lens ability to blur out backgrounds.
In short, these little primes lenses will teach you more about photography, and produce some fantastic, beautiful images straight away, without much effort.
I hope I’m not coming across as pushy about this, but I am just passionate about photography, and I hate the idea of new photographers being disillusioned and disappointed when they buy their first camera.
Trust me, the camera is fine. Any camera is fine. But it’s the kit lens that’s crappy.
If you know someone who is thinking of buying their first DSLR, please, please help them out and beg them to spend an extra £100 and pick up a decent lens to go with their new camera. They will not regret it.
—
Follow Me On: Twitter - Facebook - Flickr – 500px
About the Author
Written by Chris Scuffins
Chris Scuffins is a creative photographer and blogger from Gloucestershire. With years of experience in landscape and commercial photography, he now concentrates on capturing creative, natural and beautiful fashion and lifestyle portraiture, as well as photojournalistic wedding photography.
4 Responses to Why You Should Ditch The Kit Lens
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
ABOUT THIS BLOG
This is the blog of Chris Scuffins, a hardworking, creative photographer from Gloucestershire.
With years of experience in landscape and commercial still life photography, his focus now lies on capturing creative, natural and beautiful fashion and lifestyle portraiture, as well as a fun, relaxed approach to photojournalistic wedding photography.
FEATURED POSTS
- What To Look For In Your Wedding Photographer
Choosing your wedding photographer can be an extremely...
- Fine Art Wedding Albums By Folio Albums
I figured it was about time I did a feature on the...
- Wedding | James & Arjia | Milton Keynes
Way, way back on the 18th of August 2012, I had the...
- Wedding | Natalie And Andrew | Tewkesbury Park Hotel
A Gloucestershire Wedding | St Marks Church, Cheltenham...
POPULAR POSTS
- The 35mm And 85mm
Just a few short months after making the decision to...
- Why I Switched From Nikon to Canon
I’ll start of by being completely and utterly hypocritical....
- Wedding | Natalie And Andrew | Tewkesbury Park Hotel
A Gloucestershire Wedding | St Marks Church, Cheltenham...
- 30 Day Self Portrait Project Finished!
WooHoo! Today I have finished my 30 day self portrait...
ON FACEBOOK
BLOG CATEGORIES
- Camera Equipment (35)
- Engagement Portraiture (1)
- Everyday Photography (11)
- Inspiration (35)
- Photo Tips (17)
- Portraiture (4)
- Shooting Film (3)
- Weddings (5)
FOLLOW CHRIS:
- 500PX
- FLICKR
- PURPLE PORT
- YOUTUBE
Chris,
Great advice. I’ve just spent £1000 recently on a new camera and equipment. My first DSLR. Being a Pentax K5 I have access to all the old brilliant lenses that Pentax (and others) have made over the years. So far I have 50 f1.7, 50 f4 macro and a 28 f2.8. (All 3 are manual lenses) They are small, light. They are constructed from metal and feel like they would survive an earth quake. But most importantly of all, (as you say) the image quality is fantastic.
Don’t get me wrong, there is still a place for my kit lenses, especially the 18-55. I used it Sunday on a portraiture workshop in Leeds. I’m still learning what my camera can do, so being able to stick it in Av and Tv really helped. The lighting was difficult in places, so the semi-auto modes came in really useful, compared to the all manual lenses.
Overall though, I thoroughly agree with you in regards to prime lenses. I just feel more of a photographer with a prime on the front. It makes you think more.
Thanks
Mike.
Oh yes, and the cost of these three prime lenses?
£109.97 in total.
M.
Hey thanks for the comments!
I’ve heard nothing but good things about Pentax’s prime lenses. As you’ve shown, you don’t need to spend a lot to get some fantastic lenses!
Although there’s nothing really that wrong with an 18-55mm, I just think it would be great if there was an option of a 35mm prime kit lens with every camera. Wishful thinking I know…..
Ah yes
Bought an A200 also and well the DT 18-70 is..a horrible horrible lens. It just never gets sharp or gives you any contrast.. nope not there.
I bought some lovely minolta glass though through time. The 35-70mm F4, oh yes.. The 28-75mm F3,5-F4,5 not bad I mean metal build. Both lenses are not super fast but they are well build and sharp.
But then oh yes the Tamron SP 28-75 F2,8.. wow.. just wow.. with F2,8 it focuses so quickly. It is easy to walk around with and getting pictures even in lower lights shots.
I fear the Minolta 50mm 1.7 I have it..ahum sticky but yes the glass is sharp. The sticky handling though really really bugs me and keeps it from my camera.
I agree you got an entry level camera that can really shine. If you give it good glass.. so do give it good glass.